<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gazette&#8217;s reoganization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nbergus.com/2009/02/the-gazettes-reoganization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nbergus.com/2009/02/the-gazettes-reoganization/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on what media do, and can do better, and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Goodlove</title>
		<link>http://nbergus.com/2009/02/the-gazettes-reoganization/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goodlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbergus.com/?p=270#comment-10</guid>
		<description>First of all, I&#039;m not &quot;grizzled.&quot; You&#039;re only as old as you feel, or think. I&#039;m much &quot;younger&quot; than some people who are a lot younger in age. Anyway, Nick has some good comments. I&#039;m just not as confident &quot;watchdog&quot; journalism is a high priority at The Gazette, or media in general. Talk is cheap, there&#039;s always a lot of talk about &quot;journalism&quot; but actions show up on page 1, which at The Gazette is not that often. It&#039;s hard, hard work. If the &quot;watchdog&quot; role was that important at The Gazette, it wouldn&#039;t have abandoned its award-winning investigative unit a few years ago. Advertising does not care a whit about a &quot;watchdog&quot; role, it wants money, and happy advertisers. Controversy and conflict, asking those uncomfortable questions and letting people squirm irritates advertisers, even when they&#039;re not a target. Change will come to journalism, but the &quot;watchdog&quot; will get chained to the doghouse more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I&#8217;m not &#8220;grizzled.&#8221; You&#8217;re only as old as you feel, or think. I&#8217;m much &#8220;younger&#8221; than some people who are a lot younger in age. Anyway, Nick has some good comments. I&#8217;m just not as confident &#8220;watchdog&#8221; journalism is a high priority at The Gazette, or media in general. Talk is cheap, there&#8217;s always a lot of talk about &#8220;journalism&#8221; but actions show up on page 1, which at The Gazette is not that often. It&#8217;s hard, hard work. If the &#8220;watchdog&#8221; role was that important at The Gazette, it wouldn&#8217;t have abandoned its award-winning investigative unit a few years ago. Advertising does not care a whit about a &#8220;watchdog&#8221; role, it wants money, and happy advertisers. Controversy and conflict, asking those uncomfortable questions and letting people squirm irritates advertisers, even when they&#8217;re not a target. Change will come to journalism, but the &#8220;watchdog&#8221; will get chained to the doghouse more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

